Stupid innovation

We’re taught to glorify innovation. Every new invention is pitched as a step forward, a clever disruption, a mark of progress. But here’s the uncomfortable reality: not all innovation is good. Some of it is pointless, harmful, or simply stupid. Just because something can be invented doesn’t mean it should exist.

We don’t talk enough about bad innovation. The products that solve non-existent problems, the technologies that make products even worse.

 

A $400 Wi-Fi juicer that squeezed juice packs you could already squeeze with your hands. A monument to Silicon Valley’s obsession with reinventing the obvious.

Squeezed out: widely mocked startup Juicero is shutting down | Silicon Valley | The Guardian

Sold as the future of wearable tech. Delivered as a creepy surveillance device nobody wanted to wear in public. A failure not just of design, but of common sense.

Google Glass Enterprise Edition 2 Developer Kit (Glass Pod and Titanium Band) : Amazon.in: Electronics

  • Plastic coffee pods

Convenient but extremely unnecessary. A brilliant way to turn convenience into global pollution.

Which is best - aluminum, plastic or compostable coffee capsules?

  • Hoverboards

Cheap self-balancing scooters that exploded (literally) because manufacturers raced ahead of safety.

Hoverboard 6.5 inch White | Voltes - Electric Mobility

  • Endless social media “features”

Are stories, reels, shorts, fleets, threads and endless copies of each other necessary? Innovation disguised as repetition, designed only to steal more of our attention.

Instagram unveiled a new feature. Here's how you can use it (and why you'll want to) | ZDNET

  • 3D TVs

A stupid, useless gimmick that died almost as fast as it arrived.

Reviving Home Entertainment- Trends in the 3D TV Market

  • Disposable e-cigarettes

Marketed as a healthy alternative to smoking. In reality, they hooked a new generation on nicotine while creating mountains of toxic waste.

ECO Menthol E-Cig | Disposable E-Cigarette | ePuffer Vape

Innovation without purpose is just noise. Sometimes it’s laughable, a Wi-Fi toaster, sometimes it’s dangerous, vaping devices for teenagers, and sometimes it’s destructive, convenience products that poison ecosystems.

The real problem is that we confuse novelty with progress. We treat any new feature, any shiny object, any “world-changing” startup pitch as inherently valuable. Progress isn’t about making things new. It’s about making things better. And those two are not the same.

When money blocks progress

Business Idea. Businesswoman in a Business Suit Holds a Light Bulb in Her  Hands. a Gold Dollar Coin Light Bulb Emits Light in the Stock Vector -  Illustration of high, energy: 203548012History is filled with brilliant discoveries and revolutionary technologies that never had the chance to reach their full potential. Sometimes, it’s not because the idea didn’t work, but because it threatened powerful financial interests.

1. Nikola Tesla and the “Free Energy” Threat

Nikola Tesla’s work with alternating current (AC) revolutionized electricity distribution, defeating Thomas Edison’s less efficient direct current (DC). But Tesla’s more ambitious dream, wireless global power through the Wardenclyffe Tower, was abruptly halted when financier J.P. Morgan withdrew support. Morgan feared that if electricity could be transmitted wirelessly, it couldn’t be metered and sold. The project collapsed, and the tower was eventually dismantled for scrap, leaving one of history’s most daring visions unrealized.

2. Philo Farnsworth vs. Corporate Giants

Philo Farnsworth invented the first fully electronic television system in the 1920s, envisioning it as a tool for education and enlightenment. But his work ran headfirst into the might of RCA, whose president David Sarnoff launched lengthy legal battles over patents. The court fights drained Farnsworth’s resources, and by the time he prevailed, the commercial television industry had moved on, without him.

3. The Electric Car’s First Death

In the late 1990s, General Motors produced the EV1, a sleek, fully electric vehicle decades ahead of its time. Drivers loved it, but the car threatened oil industry profits and the traditional automotive business model. GM abruptly ended the program, repossessing and destroying most EV1s, citing “lack of demand.” Many believe the real reason was pressure from oil companies and a reluctance to invest in infrastructure that would reduce gasoline sales.

4. Renewable Energy Before Its Time

In the 1970s, inventor Frank Shuman’s earlier solar thermal power concepts from 1913 were rediscovered. Shuman had built a functioning solar power plant in Egypt long before the oil boom. His vision could have reduced reliance on fossil fuels, but with cheap oil flooding the market, investors saw no profit in solar energy. His work was shelved for decades, only reemerging when climate change forced a rethink.

5. Stanley Meyer’s Water-Fueled Car

Stanley Meyer claimed in the 1990s to have developed a car engine powered by water through a process of splitting hydrogen and oxygen using minimal energy. His technology remains disputed, but his invention drew enormous attention, but also resistance. Meyer faced lawsuits, was labeled a fraud, and died suddenly after a meeting with investors, fueling speculation that his ideas were intentionally buried to protect the oil industry’s dominance.

The Double-Edged Sword of Funding

While these stories show how money can suffocate innovation, it’s also true that funding is often the lifeblood of progress. The same financial resources that can block change can, in the right hands, accelerate it. Visionary backers have turned obscure ideas into global revolutions, consider how the Wright brothers’ modest bicycle business funded their experiments in flight, or how early venture capital propelled companies like Apple and SpaceX from garages to the global stage. The difference lies in the motivation of the person holding the purse strings. If their goal is short-term profit, disruptive innovation becomes a threat; if they value long-term progress, money becomes a powerful catalyst for change. In this way, financial influence is neither inherently good nor bad, it’s a tool, and the outcome depends entirely on the wielder.

These stories of failure share a common thread: innovation that threatened established financial power met swift resistance. Ideas with the potential to disrupt profitable industries are often silenced, delayed, or discredited. Science moves forward not just through discovery, but through the courage to resist the forces that would rather see the status quo remain intact.

Is AI killing or saving innovation?

The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Innovation | AppsGeyser BlogArtificial Intelligence is often seen as the driving force behind a new industrial revolution. It can be very helpful in various fields, from medicine to marketing, but is it moral to use AI for everything, especially innovation?

Is AI Fueling Creativity or Replacing It?

At first glance, AI seems like the ideal partner for innovation. It can analyze data at incredible speeds, identify patterns that escape our notice, and take over mundane tasks, allowing humans to concentrate on supposedly more important creative endeavors.

But here’s the harsh reality: AI doesn’t create. It enhances.

AI reorganizes what we already know. It takes existing information and mixes it into new, yet unoriginal results. For instance, GPT models aren’t envisioning the future, they’re forecasting the next likely word based on historical data. That’s helpful, but not true originality.

Genuine innovation often arises from conflict, gut feelings, wild ideas, or even mistakes, elements that AI tends to eliminate. If we’re not careful, AI could make our results quicker but less impactful.

 

The good in AI

It would be a mistake to brush off AI as just a copycat. When utilized effectively, it acts as a catalyst for innovation.

Take drug discovery, for example; AI can model billions of molecular interactions in just a few days. In climate modeling, it generates scenarios that no human team could ever calculate. In language translation, it removes barriers and makes knowledge accessible to everyone.

But maybe the most significant aspect is that AI fosters inclusivity in innovation. Tools that used to need technical knowledge are now available through user-friendly AI platforms. A high school student can now produce a short film with professional quality. In these situations, AI doesn’t just accelerate processes. It opens up opportunities—and that’s genuine innovation.

 

The bad in AI

Now, here’s a more concerning angle: As AI systems improve at providing answers, we’re getting worse at asking the right questions.

There’s a quiet decline in human judgment taking place. Professionals in various fields are increasingly leaning on AI’s recommendations and placing their trust in them. This isn’t merely a technical problem, it’s a cultural shift. We’re gradually moving being problem-solvers to just prompt-writers.

 

In the future

The discussion shouldn’t be “AI vs. humans,” but rather “AI alongside humans.” The true frontier is in co-creation, using AI to uncover paths we couldn’t see on our own, rather than having it do the walking for us.

 

AI shouldn’t be the one innovating. It should be a booster. It can enhance our tools, broaden our horizons, and speed up processes. The twist is that as AI gets stronger, the value of human creativity increases. Innovation isn’t solely about what we can create. It’s about the choices we make in what we create and the reasons behind those choices.

AI isn’t killing or saving innovation. It’s reshaping it. And it’s up to the user to reshape it in their own way.